Protecting the Public
Dear Anthony,
I wanted to thank you for writing such an interesting article in the November issue of Counseling Today regarding Life Coaches. I am a recent graduate in Community Counseling and just passed the LPC exam.
Here in Dallas, a lot of so-called “hypnotist/hypnotherapists” pass themselves off as therapists and life coaches. It’s amazing because they have NO clinical training to practice mental health. I’m wondering if there are any laws out there to protect the public.
For example, there is a guy in Dallas who is top listed on Google for Hypnotherapy.
The guy claims to be a “board certified hypnotherapist”…but in reality it requires no formal education nor licensure. If you look at his site, he claims to treat all kinds of clinical issues … including addictions. There are an awful lot of people out there claiming to by hypnotherapists, but are not licensed by the state to perform therapy. I’m wondering what I can do as a counselor to change this situation?
Sincerely,
Jeremy Porter
– – –
Dear Jeremy,
Thank you so much for reading, and for your comments about, my column!
The issue of licensure you describe is complicated, evolving all the time, and differs by state.
In Massachusetts, where my practice was founded, the term “Mental Health Counseling” is regulated. However, other terms, such as “psychotherapy” and “counseling” have not always been regulated. Note: they might be now, but in my discussions with the board of licensure in the mid 2000s there were not regulated.
Hence, at that time persons could hang a shingle and provide services called “psychotherapy” or “counseling” and –depending on what they were actually doing—they might be working within the law. Truly, every time a term is regulated it seems someone comes up with a new title that’s note regulated. Consider “life coaching”, “mentorship”, “listening services”, “life consulting” or who knows what else.
It seems, you are having a similar experience, with someone providing services under the term “Hypnotherapy.”
However, regardless of the title one is using, they might still be in violation of laws for practicing medicine, or psychology / mental health services, without a license. It seems the person you’re citing is claiming to treat additions, depression, etc…. I’m not sure about your local laws, but it seems such claims might very well might cross the line in your state.
If you’re trying to practice in the same marketplace, I think that a good approach for you and other licensed mental health professionals (counselors, social workers, psychologists) is to emphasize your strengths to potential clients. This might include:
1 – Showing the difference in caliber of education and licensure you possess
2 – Being eligible to accept clients’ insurance (which unlicensed providers can’t do)
3 – Patient/Client Privilege — The legal protection of client privacy licensed counselors have, but others don’t.
Jeremy, I hope this helps!!
Sincerely,
Anthony
Dr. Anthony Centore
Let’s keep in touch! Sign up to receive our newsletter:
Anthony Centore
What a lot of you fail to understand is that licensure has very little to do with education. Licensure is about pledging to follow a code of restrictions and ethics that anyone without a license is not bound to follow. These codes are in place to protect the client. They cover things like training, education, fees, confidentiality, protecting clients, protecting others, etc. When people operate without a license they can pretty much behave however they want with no real repercussions. This is normally fine… especially in the case of simple life coaching matters. But ask yourself… Would you send your son or daughter with an addiction or serious mental problems to someone that has no real consequences for behaving exactly however they want to? For that matter, would you send them to a doctor who has no license?
In some areas, it is possible to work without a license in a group practice, where a licensed individual may sign off on your work.
The fact is that there are many people who want to stop others from helping individuals that they’re well qualified to help simply because they have no license, while many with a license don’t give a darn about their client. Why is this lady so concerned with the practice of other? It sounds as if she wants to control the system, so that she can make more money instead of worrying about the number of people who need help, she’s worried about people who want to help others. Why?