Protecting the Public
Dear Anthony,
I wanted to thank you for writing such an interesting article in the November issue of Counseling Today regarding Life Coaches. I am a recent graduate in Community Counseling and just passed the LPC exam.
Here in Dallas, a lot of so-called “hypnotist/hypnotherapists” pass themselves off as therapists and life coaches. It’s amazing because they have NO clinical training to practice mental health. I’m wondering if there are any laws out there to protect the public.
For example, there is a guy in Dallas who is top listed on Google for Hypnotherapy.
The guy claims to be a “board certified hypnotherapist”…but in reality it requires no formal education nor licensure. If you look at his site, he claims to treat all kinds of clinical issues … including addictions. There are an awful lot of people out there claiming to by hypnotherapists, but are not licensed by the state to perform therapy. I’m wondering what I can do as a counselor to change this situation?
Sincerely,
Jeremy Porter
– – –
Dear Jeremy,
Thank you so much for reading, and for your comments about, my column!
The issue of licensure you describe is complicated, evolving all the time, and differs by state.
In Massachusetts, where my practice was founded, the term “Mental Health Counseling” is regulated. However, other terms, such as “psychotherapy” and “counseling” have not always been regulated. Note: they might be now, but in my discussions with the board of licensure in the mid 2000s there were not regulated.
Hence, at that time persons could hang a shingle and provide services called “psychotherapy” or “counseling” and –depending on what they were actually doing—they might be working within the law. Truly, every time a term is regulated it seems someone comes up with a new title that’s note regulated. Consider “life coaching”, “mentorship”, “listening services”, “life consulting” or who knows what else.
It seems, you are having a similar experience, with someone providing services under the term “Hypnotherapy.”
However, regardless of the title one is using, they might still be in violation of laws for practicing medicine, or psychology / mental health services, without a license. It seems the person you’re citing is claiming to treat additions, depression, etc…. I’m not sure about your local laws, but it seems such claims might very well might cross the line in your state.
If you’re trying to practice in the same marketplace, I think that a good approach for you and other licensed mental health professionals (counselors, social workers, psychologists) is to emphasize your strengths to potential clients. This might include:
1 – Showing the difference in caliber of education and licensure you possess
2 – Being eligible to accept clients’ insurance (which unlicensed providers can’t do)
3 – Patient/Client Privilege — The legal protection of client privacy licensed counselors have, but others don’t.
Jeremy, I hope this helps!!
Sincerely,
Anthony
Dr. Anthony Centore
Let’s keep in touch! Sign up to receive our newsletter:
Anthony Centore
I have been a licensed LPC for the past 10 years and I agree with Jennifer’s comment. There is a lot more to counseling than “helping” another person. An individual, licensed or not, can do more harm than good for a client if they have not worked through or gained awareness of their own issues. Yes, every person struggles with their own issues and many have gained valuable life experience and insight that others can learn from. They are providing advice and insight, motivation and inspiration, but not counseling.
Licensure exists for the purpose of regulating the profession and protecting the public from harm. While the process requires a financial and time investment, it is what one does if they wish to become a counselor/therapist, the same as any other profession that is regulated (doctors, dentists, lawyers, teachers). As Jennifer said, “go to school, do the work, do your time”. And there are many programs that cost less than $70,000. Just make sure the program you attend meets licensure requirements in your state.
That being said, more consistent regulation across states and reciprocity is needed for the profession to grow strong and gain value. Without it, many qualified and licensed are unable to relocate and become licensed in their new state without being required to jump through impossible hoops to meet requirements that may seem irrelevant. As professionals, we devalue licensure and our profession when we are forced to find a way around the laws to be able to continue our work after relocating.
For those stating that the purpose of licensure is to bill insurance, it sounds to me like an excuse to NOT do the work and/or become licensed. Although, licensure is required for insurance credentialing, one has a choice to contract or not with insurance companies, regardless of licensure status.
totally on your page with this . AHO!
Just cuz something is in the system doesn’t mean its the healthiest thing.
THANK YOU!